ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025
Advancements in Parkinson's Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Neurological Perspective.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to predict the severity of Parkinson's disease (PD) by leveraging a comprehensive dataset integrating cerebrospinal fluid protein and peptide data sourced from UniProt, normalized protein expression metrics, clinical assessments, and gait data. The dataset comprised 248 PD patients monitored longitudinally, with periodic evaluations including 227 proteins, 971 peptides, gait parameters, and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) scores at baseline 0, 6, 12, and 24 months.
methodsA multifaceted machine learning framework was employed, consisting of random forest, TensorFlow decision forests, and a custom-developed phaseshift ensembling model. Additionally, regression techniques such as linear regression, random forest regressor, decision tree regressor, and K-nearest neighbors were utilized to support the predictions. These models aimed to forecast PD severity as reflected by UPDRS scores.
resultsThe custom phase-shift ensembling model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an average symmetric mean absolute percentage error (sMAPE) of 55 across all UPDRS sections. Notably, the random forest regressor excelled in predicting motor function severity (UPDRS-III), attaining an sMAPE of 77.32, indicating its ability to model complex disease progression dynamics effectively.
conclusionsIntegrating biological markers, clinical scores, and gait dynamics facilitates accurate modeling of PD progression. The ensemble-based approach, particularly phase-shift ensembling, improves prediction robustness and interpretability, offering a powerful strategy for the early prediction of PD severity. This study highlights the value of multi-source data fusion and advanced machine learning techniques in supporting early diagnosis and informed treatment planning for neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.