ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025
Public Perceptions and Barriers to Tuberculosis Treatment in Korea: A Large Language Model-Based Analysis of Naver Knowledge-iN Data from 2002 to 2024.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors for treatment failure of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: results from a two-decade data analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study was conducted to investigate public perceptions and concerns surrounding tuberculosis (TB) treatment in Korea through an analysis of online queries about antitubercular medications. Additionally, it evaluated the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) as analytical tools for processing unstructured healthcare data.
methodsUsing LLMs, this study analyzed 44,174 questions that mentioned TB from Naver Knowledge-iN (2002-2024). Questions referencing antitubercular medications were extracted and thematically categorized. Side effects were analyzed through parallel approaches examining general and medication-specific effects. Questions about infectivity and social implications were further analyzed using text embedding, dimensionality reduction, and clustering. The performance of LLMs was evaluated against human researchers and traditional methods.
resultsAmong questions mentioning specific medications (n = 919), rifampin (31.8%) and isoniazid (31.6%) were most frequently referenced. Of the 10,044 questions regarding antitubercular medication, management challenges represented the largest category (44.8%). Analysis of infectivity and social implications (n = 583) revealed previously unidentified concerns about blood donation and immigration eligibility. Employment-related concerns constituted the largest distinct subgroup (20.6%). Hepatotoxicity, dermatosis, and vomiting were the most frequently reported side effects. LLMs outperformed keyword matching in data processing and offered cost advantages over human analysis, with finetuning further reducing processing costs.
conclusionsThis study produced novel insights into public concerns regarding TB treatment and demonstrated the effectiveness of combining social media platform data with LLM-based analysis, providing a systematic framework for future healthcare research using unstructured public data and LLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.