ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025
Digitalizing Emergency Referral System and its Evaluation in Northern Thailand.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThailand recently implemented an electronic emergency referral system, known as "HIS.SANSAI," to improve the speed, efficiency, and quality of patient care. This study evaluated the impact of HIS.SANSAI on user experiences and health outcomes.
methodsA multimethod approach was employed, combining data analysis from a cross-sectional survey that quantified users' preferences and perceptions with an examination of de-identified emergency referral records from 2019 to 2021. Multiple regression analysis assessed whether HIS.SANSAI significantly reduced the duration of medical services, while logistic regression evaluated changes in health outcomes before and after its implementation.
resultsThe survey results revealed high proficiency in system capabilities. Referring hospitals (sending hospitals) rated the system highest, with a score of 8.00 for "Reducing coordinated time." Referral hospitals (receiving hospitals) expressed moderate satisfaction, scoring highest (7.03) for "Reducing mistakes in patient information transfer" and lowest (4.27) for "Ease of use when recording." The effects of HIS.SANSAI were partially supported. Positive outcomes included shorter service times and a 13.16% reduction in severity at emergency room discharge for ischemic stroke patients. However, negative consequences were observed, such as notable treatment delays for acute appendicitis patients.
conclusionsHIS.SANSAI demonstrated robust system capabilities and reduced errors in patient information transfer. Its impact on health outcomes was mixed, with both positive and negative effects. Further evaluation and enhancements are necessary to optimize the system's overall effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.