ArticleClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2026
The use of birefringence for human spermatozoa selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection to improve artificial reproductive technology outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an era where male infertility poses significant challenges for many couples, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is becoming increasingly common. Microscopic evaluation of sperm head morphology can contribute to the development of healthier embryos. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. A meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) for randomized controlled trials. Eligible studies were selected based on the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison/Comparator, Outcomes, Study type) model. The pregnancy outcomes considered after artificial reproductive technology (ART) procedures included the fertilization rate (FR), high-quality embryo rate (HQER), implantation rate (IR), and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023423108). Of 105 records evaluated, three studies met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis indicated that birefringence sperm selection significantly improved HQER and IR after ART, although no significant differences were observed for FR and CPR. The use of birefringence for sperm selection in ICSI cycles may represent a straightforward strategy to improve ART outcomes, particularly for couples with abnormal sperm parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.