ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025
Latent Profile Analysis of Resilience and Its Association With Psychological Factors in Patients Diagnosed With Depression and Anxiety Disorders.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to classify the level of resilience among outpatients and investigate the relationship of resilience with depression, state anxiety, and psychological factors.
methodsA total of 1,498 outpatients were recruited from a university hospital in Korea. The latent profile analysis of the resilience factor was identified using the R-based Jamovi 2.3.24 software. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the differences between depression, state anxiety, and psychological factors; Scheffe's test was used to conduct multiple comparisons.
resultsThree latent profiles were identified, including the high level of resilience (Class 1, 19.7%), the moderate level of resilience (Class 2, 47.9%), and the low level of resilience (Class 3, 32.4%). Depression and state anxiety were higher in Class 3 than Class 1 and 2. In analyzing Class 1, individuals with depressive and anxiety symptoms scored higher on anger rumination compared with those without symptoms, but there were no differences in cognitive emotion regulation. Childhood emotional neglect was higher for individuals with depressive symptoms compared to those without symptoms in Class 1.
conclusionThis study provides an in-depth understanding of resilience and insights into the association between resilience, depression, anxiety, and psychological factors. It is necessary to provide sufficient support and interventions to regulate anger rumination and emotional factors among outpatients in Class 1 with depression and state anxiety symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.