Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40840553›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology

Emerging Biomimetic Drug Delivery Nanoparticles Inspired by Extracellular Vesicles.

Viswanathan Sundaram, Santosh Aryal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Viswanathan SundaramDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Health Outcomes, The Ben and Maytee Fisch College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Santosh AryalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Health Outcomes, The Ben and Maytee Fisch College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7807-6342

Funding

Engineering Natural Killer Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicular Nanodrug for Tumor Targeted Bioimaging and TherapyR15EB036962 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS TYLER · PI ARYAL, SANTOSH · 2025 to 2025
$441k
Re-engineering Tumor Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles with Exogenous Tags for Downstream AnalysisR15EB030815 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS TYLER · PI ARYAL, SANTOSH · 2020 to 2020
$427k
NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB030815NIBIB NIH HHS R15EB030815-02NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB036962NIBIB NIH HHS R15EB036962-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) made up of cellular components such as extracellular vesicles (EVs) with a biomimetic outlook have emerged as a revolutionary approach in nanomedicine, providing significant benefits for targeted drug administration, immunotherapy, monitoring therapeutic response, and diagnostic applications. Utilizing the distinctive characteristics of natural cell membranes, membrane proteins, and cellular contents, these biomimetic NPs acquire essential biological functions from their source and biogenesis, including immune evasion, extended circulation, and target recognition, rendering them optimal candidates for therapeutic applications. This review offers a comprehensive examination of the methodologies of EVs infused with synthetic NP systems with the goal of overcoming their respective shortcomings. For instance, EVs are biogenic with cellular targeting features, but their isolation yield is limited, and their structural and colloidal stability are weak. Whereas, we have decades of experience in the mass production of highly stable synthetic NPs, they lack cellular targeting features. Therefore, the integration of these two systems as a single entity in the field of nanomedicine has gained significant attention. In this review, we emphasized the variety of EVs sources, such as erythrocytes, leukocytes, cancer cells, and stem cells, each providing unique biological benefits. Critical procedures encompassing EV's separation, coating processes, and material integration were examined while addressing the issues, including scalability, membrane stability, and preservation of functionality. Additionally, their promise in customized medicine is analyzed, highlighting their immediate medical applications. This review seeks to elucidate the existing methodologies, their constraints, and prospective advancements in the creation of EV-derived biomimetic NPs for clinical use. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsDrug Delivery SystemsMolecular Targeted TherapyNanoparticlesAnimalsExtracellular VesiclesHumansLiposomesNanotechnologyLiposomesdrug deliveryexosomesextracellular vesicleshybrid vesiclesliposomes

Identifiers

PMID40840553
PMCPMC12370395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.