ReviewTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025
The Effectiveness of Dengue Vector Control: A Meta-Review.
Review in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Dengue Vector Control: A Meta-Review.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDengue vector control plays an important role in reducing the burden of dengue infection. This study aimed to summarise the evidence of published systematic reviews on the efficacy of dengue vector control interventions.
methodsSystematic reviews of cluster randomised controlled trials and randomised controlled trials in populations/people exposed to the risk of dengue infection in the presence of the vector were included. All dengue vector control, all comparators and any outcomes were considered in this review. Electronic databases and reference lists were searched. Screening, full-text reviews, data extractions and quality assessments were conducted independently by two reviewers with resolution by a third reviewer.
resultsA total of 15 systematic reviews were included in this study, but narrative synthesis was performed for only 3 reviews that reviewed cluster randomised controlled trials or randomised controlled trials. Community mobilisation and insecticide-treated materials were weakly effective interventions reported by two systematic reviews that have acceptable methodological quality. However, the non-overlapping of randomised controlled trials and cluster randomised controlled trials included in their respective reviews may affect the findings.
conclusionThere is insufficient evidence to recommend a method of dengue vector control management. Novel dengue vector control methods are highly encouraged for urgent trials. Until then, the current respective local governments' vector control management may still play a vital role in controlling the mosquito's propagation and transmission of dengue infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.