ArticleJMIR cancer2025
Information Needs of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer and Their Supports in Relation to Treatment Management Choices: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Telemedicine App for Nonrigid Facial Rehabilitation Training Enhanced by Efficient Fully Convolutional Neural Network With Residual Network (EffiFCNN-ResNet) to Improve Accessibility for Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Mapping the radiotherapy journey of patients with head and neck cancer: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer in the United States.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- The chain-mediating role of anxiety and depression in the relationship between symptom clusters and perceived cognitive function in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a cross-sectional study of 556 participants.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advances in research and modes of information delivery provide new opportunities to access medical information. Despite this, patient information needs on head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment are not sufficiently met. Objective: The aim is to investigate (1) information content required for patients with HNC and their caregivers to support confident decisions about their treatment, (2) information needs by role (eg, patient and caregiver), and (3) the preferred format or mode of information delivery. Results will be used to inform the development and testing of a decision aid for this patient population. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al frameworks. The search was carried out in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and limited to the English language between 2012 and the search date of September 20, 2022. Studies were dual-screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria, central to which was a focus on information needs within the context of decision-making. Data were extracted from the articles using prespecified criteria into a data extraction sheet that was pilot-tested and refined prior to its application. Reporting followed the research questions and was guided by PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). Results: A total of 10,495 publications were identified, with 30 articles suitable for data extraction. High information needs included details of the diagnosis (3/30, 10%), purpose (6/30, 20%), and risks (10/30, 33%) of medical procedures; strategies for eating and speaking during and after treatment (6/30, 20%); lifestyle guidelines for survivorship (4/30, 13%); and facts about the human papillomavirus (2/30, 7%). Moderate information needs included the physical (10/30, 33%) and psychological (17/30, 57%) domains of posttreatment, treatment options (6/30, 20%), strategies to improve communication with health care providers (8/30, 27%), and nutrition (8/30, 27%). Information needs of patients with HNC and their caregivers evolved through the phases of treatment, highlighting the need for relevant information to support collaborative decision-making with their health care providers. Caregiver needs were underrepresented (5/30, 17%), but more information on stress reduction strategies for the patient, how to play a role in treatment decisions, and where to obtain the best medical care for the patient was identified. The preferred mode of delivery for information varied and reflected the age, gender, and country of the sample populations. Conclusions: Information needs of patients with HNC and their caregivers are not being met to a satisfactory level, evidenced by the breadth of outstanding needs. Health care providers must consider evolving patient and caregiver information needs, addressing concerns on an individual basis to support shared decision-making. Tools are needed to support information delivery that is acceptable to patients and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.