ArticlePoultry science2025
Dark brooders during rearing affect fearfulness but not production parameters of broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dark brooders are often suggested as enrichment for broiler chickens because they promote natural motivated behaviors compared to conventional barren environments in broiler production. Although the use of brooders is thought to convey benefits for animal welfare, it is not well described how they might affect parameters related to production and health. The objective of this study was to investigate if providing dark brooders affects production, health, behavior, and welfare compared to a control group without dark brooders. Six pens of each treatment were used, keeping 60 mixed-sex chickens (Ross 308) per pen for a full rearing period of 35 days. Data on growth, mortality, gait score, litter quality, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV)-specific antibody titers, and fearfulness were collected. There were no differences in BW at day 35 (brooders: 2857.3 ± 40.8 g, control: 2831.9 ± 39.6 g, p = 0.55) or feed conversion ratio (FCR) (brooders: 1.44, control: 1.45, P = 0.87). Nor were there any differences in mortality, gait score, or litter quality (P > 0.05). However, birds reared with brooders showed lower IBV titers compared to the control at 15 days after vaccination (P = 0.0448), although there were no other differences between treatments at 0, 22, or 29 days after vaccination. Chickens reared with dark brooders were less fearful as shown by shorter latency to first head movement in the tonic immobility test (brooders: 197.2 ± 15.9 s, control: 307.6 ± 17.9 s, P = 0.0002), shorter latency to turn itself around in tonic immobility test (brooders: 234 ± 19.7 s, control: 351 ± 29.5 s, P = 0.0012), more chickens near the object in the novel object test (brooders: 2.6 ± 0.25 birds, control: 1.5 ± 0.16 birds, P < 0.0001), and more chickens near the observer in the adapted touch test (brooders: 9.8 ± 0.28 birds, control: 4.8 ± 0.28 birds, P < 0.0001). The results of this study indicate that the use of dark brooders does not affect production or health of broiler chickens, however, birds with brooders were less fearful. Fear is a negative emotion and thus reducing fear should increase bird welfare. Therefore, dark brooders may be a useful tool to increase broiler welfare without negatively affecting production or health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.