Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40840016›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2025

Role of RNA in genome folding: It's all about affinity.

Rafal Czapiewski, Nick Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rafal CzapiewskiMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Crewe Rd, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Nick GilbertMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Crewe Rd, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. Electronic address: Nick.Gilbert@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammalian cells, RNA species make up ∼10% of chromatin by mass and play a structural role in the nucleus by acting as scaffolds and influencing genome organisation. Although many proteins bind nuclear RNAs, these interactions are often non-specific, making it challenging to define RNA's role in genome folding. Nonetheless, a clearer picture is emerging. Some RNAs, like NEAT1 and MALAT1, have high affinity for specific RNA-binding proteins and form the basis for nuclear bodies. In contrast, many nuclear proteins bind RNA weakly, resulting in numerous low-affinity interactions. We propose that these interactions generate a complex RNA-protein network with dynamic, gel-like properties that modulate chromatin folding and transcription factor mobility. This suggests an exciting feedback mechanism in which newly transcribed RNA contributes directly to shaping chromatin architecture.

Indexed as

GenomeRNAAnimalsChromatinHumansProtein BindingRNA-Binding ProteinsChromatinRNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40840016
PMCPMC7619226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.