ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Trends in Risk Factor Prevalence and Incidence of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and trends of risk factors and comorbidities among patients treated for acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry, 2014-2024.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Validity of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes in diagnosing myocardial infarction subtypes.American heart journal · 2026Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for Coronary Collateral Circulation Development After Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Metabolic risk factors associated with premature myocardial infarction in adults ≤ 35 years: a case-control study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContemporary trends in traditional and nontraditional risk factors (RFs) among young adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are not well understood.
objectivesThis study sought to determine differences and trends in the prevalence of traditional and nontraditional RFs among young and older adults hospitalized with incident AMI.
methodsIncident AMI hospitalizations were analyzed from 2011 to 2021 from the National Inpatient Sample and stratified by age (young adults 18-54 years of age and older adults >54 years of age). Overall RF prevalence and trends in traditional (eg, hypertension) and nontraditional (eg, psychosocial factors) RFs were assessed. Subgroup analysis by sex and race/ethnicity was performed.
resultsAmong 4,431,901 incident AMI hospitalizations, 974,521 (22%) were young adults. Hypertension (64.8%) and tobacco use (57.8%) were the most prevalent RFs in young adults overall. Among 5 traditional RFs, tobacco smoking and obesity were significantly higher in young adults compared to older adults. Among 12 nontraditional RFs, lowest income quartile, family history of ischemic heart disease, and psychiatric disorders were significantly higher in young adults. Within young adults, women and non-Whites had a higher prevalence of both traditional and nontraditional RFs. Across the study period, the prevalence of most traditional and nontraditional RFs in young adults increased significantly (P
conclusionsYoung adults with AMI have a different and increasing burden of both traditional and nontraditional RFs compared to older adults. These findings could help guide strategies for primary prevention of AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.