ArticleJACC. Advances2025
The Heartline Experience: Achieving Long-Term Participant Engagement in Digital Health Technology Trials.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04276441 (HEARTLINE - A Heart Health Study Using Digital Technology to Investigate if Early AF Diagnosis Reduces the Risk of Thromboembolic Events Like Stroke IN the Real-world Environment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HEARTLINE - A Heart Health Study Using Digital Technology to Investigate if Early AF Diagnosis Reduces the Risk of Thromboembolic Events Like Stroke IN the Real-world Environment
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational human gut microbiome research: What are the missing pieces of the puzzle?Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Atrial Fibrillation and Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review of Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Therapeutic Strategies, and Digital Health Technologies in Neuroprotection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital health technologies can potentially improve clinical research efficiency and increase participant diversity but have challenges with long-term participant engagement.
objectivesThe Heartline Study evaluated the impact of a mobile app-based heart health engagement program with the Irregular Rhythm Notification (IRN) and electrocardiogram features of the Apple Watch on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in U.S. participants aged ≥65 years.
methodsParticipants were randomized 3:1 to the watch group (vs no watch control group), stratified by prevalent atrial fibrillation. Participants interfaced with the study via a custom, app-based engagement program designed to facilitate participant enrollment, post-IRN follow-up, and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) collection. To ensure users would respond to app-based reminders to complete ePROs and follow-up with providers after a potential IRN, targeted engagement strategies based on behavioral science principles were incorporated, including human-centered design, curated health education, and points-based incentives.
resultsOf 34,244 enrolled Heartline participants, 32,299 (94%) started the program. High, longitudinal participant engagement was seen, with 93% actively engaged with the app at least weekly after 1 year, and 86% after 2 years. ePRO completion rates were 82% at 1 year and 76% at 2 years. Upon study completion, participants reported high satisfaction with the study and their personal investment.
conclusionsStudy adherence in Heartline was high and sustained through 2-year follow-up, using a purposely designed engagement program delivered by a mobile app. Participants in this older population remotely and regularly submitted study information through the app and reported high study satisfaction (A Study to Investigate if Early Atrial Fibrillation [AF] Diagnosis Reduces Risk of Events Like Stroke in the Real-World; NCT04276441).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.