ArticlePain2025
Elucidating interplay between myrcene and cannabinoid receptor 1 receptors to produce antinociception in mouse models of neuropathic pain.
Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabinoid efficacy for pain: dose, chronicity and route.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Topical 5% Cannabidiol Plus Myrcene for the Treatment of Vestibulodynia: A Multi-Centric Randomized Controlled Trial.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Phytochemical Modulators of Nociception: A Review of Cannabis Terpenes in Chronic Pain Syndromes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe need for nonaddictive and effective treatments for chronic pain are at an all-time high. Historical precedence, and now clinical evidence, supports the use of cannabis for alleviating chronic pain. A plethora of research on delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol exists, yet cannabis is comprised of a multitude of constituents, some of which possess analgesic potential, that have not been systematically investigated, including the terpene myrcene. Myrcene attenuates pain hypersensitivity in preclinical models and is one of the most abundant terpenes found in cannabis. Despite these findings, it remains unclear how myrcene elicits these effects on nociceptive systems. The present study uses a male and female mouse model of neuropathic pain as well as in vitro experiments with HEK293T cells to explore these questions. We first demonstrate myrcene (1-200 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently increases mechanical nociceptive thresholds, where potency was greater in female compared with male pain mice. Testing canonical tetrad outcomes, mice were tested for hypolocomotion and hypothermia after myrcene administration. Myrcene did not alter locomotion or temperature, but female pain mice showed a conditioned place aversion to myrcene. A cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) antagonist inhibited myrcene's anti-allodynia. By contrast, in vitro cell culture experiments using a TRUPATH assay revealed myrcene does not directly activate CB1 receptors nor alter CB1 receptor activity elicited by CB1 agonist (CP 55,940) or endocannabinoids (anandamide or 2-arachidonoylglycerol). Understanding engagement of CB1 receptors in pain modulation and myrcene's mechanism of action warrants further study to understand the diversity of cannabis pharmacology and to further the frontier of pain research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40839768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.