ArticlePloS one2025
An improved YOLOv8s-based UAV target detection algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ADA-YOLO: An Adaptive Dynamic Aggregation Network for Small Object Detection in UAV Imagery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At present, the low-altitude economy is booming, and the application of drones has shown explosive growth, injecting new vitality into economic development. UAVs will face complex environmental perception and security risks when operating in low airspace. Accurate target detection technology has become a key support to ensure the orderly operation of UAVs. This paper studies UAV target detection algorithm based on deep learning, in order to improve detection accuracy and speed, and meet the needs of UAV autonomous perception under the background of low altitude economy. This study focuses on the limitations of the YOLOv8s target detection algorithm, including its low efficiency in multi-scale feature processing and insufficient small target detection capability, which hinder its ability to perform rapid and accurate large-scale searches for drones. An improved target detection algorithm is proposed to address these issues. The algorithm introduces AKConv into the C2F module. AKConv allows for convolution kernels with arbitrary numbers and sampling shapes, enabling convolution operations to more precisely adapt to targets at different locations, thereby achieving more efficient feature extraction. To further enhance the model's ability to extract critical features of small targets, the SPPF module incorporates the LSKA mechanism. This mechanism captures long-range dependencies and adaptivity more effectively while addressing computational complexity issues associated with large convolution kernels. Finally, the Bi-FPN feature pyramid network structure is introduced at the 18th layer of the model to accelerate and enrich feature fusion in the neck. Combined with the SCDown structure, a novel Bi-SCDown-FPN feature pyramid network structure is proposed, making it more suitable for detecting targets with insufficient feature capture in complex environments. Experimental results on the VisDrone2019 UAV dataset show that the improved algorithm achieves a 5.9%, 4.5%, and 6.1% increase in detection precision, detection recall, and mean average precision, respectively, compared to the original algorithm. Moreover, the parameter count and weight file size are reduced by 13.41% and 13.33%, respectively. Compared to other mainstream target detection algorithms, the proposed method demonstrates certain advantages. In summary, the target detection algorithm proposed in this paper achieves a dual improvement in model lightweighting and detection accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.