ArticlePloS one2025
Ethnomedicinal documentation, phytochemical characterization, and biological evaluation of the traditional medicinal plants from Swat region of Pakistan.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elemental Profiling and Health Risk Assessment of Aromatic Oils Used for Oral and Topical Applications.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants traditionally used in Daulat Nagar, Punjab, Pakistan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Article
- Bioassay-guided isolation and structural characterization of antimicrobial phytoconstituents fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional medicinal plants are a primary source of natural products which are used for the prevention and treatment of various infections throughout the world. This study documents the ethnomedicinal investigation, phytochemical characterization, thin layer chromatographic (TLC) profiling and bioactivities of 17 traditionally used medicinal plants, belonging to 12 taxonomic families from the Swat region of Pakistan. The plants were collected after interviewing local ethnomedicinal knowledge holders, and confirmation of their effective use by the local population and available literature. The extracts (85) were prepared in five different solvents (hexane, acetone, ethanol, methanol, and water), and were tested for a range of bioactivities: antibacterial (5 Gram-positive and 9 Gram-negative bacteria), antifungal (6 yeasts), antibiofilm (S. aureus and C. albicans), and cytotoxicity (cancerous and non-cancerous cell lines). Results demonstrated that 25% of the extracts showed pronounced activity (inhibition value [IV] > 50%) against different planktonic microbes, and 35% against biofilm strains of bacteria and fungi, with ethanol being the best solvent. Cytotoxicity was often observed against a tumor cell, but rarely against non-tumoral cell lines. A number of phytochemical compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, steroids, terpenoids, coumarins, tannins, saponins, chalcones, and quinones were detected in the extracts using standard phytochemical characterization methods, which were further authenticated through TLC separations. This is the first study to report the phytochemical screening, TLC profiling, and bioactivities of these medicinal plants, particularly their antibiofilm properties, which have not been documented previously by other researchers. This work is a significant addition to the field which reinforces the importance of indigenous knowledge in selecting medicinal plants for drug discovery based on local remedies. In conclusion, plants like Juglans regia, Punica granatum, Artemisia maritima, Aesculus indica, Thymus linearis, Nasturtium officinale, Berberis lyceum, Dysphania ambrosioides, and Mentha spicata show promise for further research as a potential sources for novel drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.