ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Feasibility of integrating human and animal disease surveillance and reporting in Rwanda: Insights from a mobile reporting pilot and veterinarians' perspectives - a multi-method study.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rwandan veterinary health system lacks reliable animal disease surveillance data, hindering effective response to zoonotic diseases and other animal health events, including pathogen spillovers with pandemic potential. To address this gap, we piloted a mobile phone reporting system among veterinarians to (1) collect data on animal and human health events and (2) gather insights for future implementations, strengthening the reporting system's operationalization. A multi-method approach was employed with 14 veterinarians equipped with smartphones. We developed a real-time reporting questionnaire synchronized with a central server and trained the veterinarians to use it during regular field visits. To evaluate the pilot, 11 in-depth interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while thematic analysis identified key qualitative themes. Over the study period, veterinarians submitted 1,181 reports through the mobile system, documenting 1,232 cattle disease cases. Common symptoms included inappetence (56.4%) and fever (53.3%). Suspected diseases were primarily East Coast Fever (36.8%) and anaplasmosis (17.4%), with diagnostic tests performed in only 3.6% of cases. Among 3,337 cattle owners, 354 self-reported illness, with 72.6% seeking medical attention. Mobile reporting proved feasible, improving veterinarians' record-keeping, communication, and collaboration. Key implementation facilitators included training, financial allowances, and technical support, while challenges involved phone capacity and network coverage. Veterinarians leveraged community trust to gather human health data, describing the process as both educational and empowering, and strongly supported the system's continued use and enhancements. This pilot highlighted the potential of mobile reporting systems to enhance veterinary practice and zoonotic disease surveillance in remote areas. Positive experiences from veterinarians underscore its feasibility, though scaling up requires investments in training, support, incentives, and addressing technological barriers. Future research should evaluate cost-effectiveness and stakeholder readiness to optimize adoption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.