Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839642›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Community perceptions of citizen science approach in pandemic preparedness and response in South and Southeast Asian countries.

Dinesh Kumar, Ingo Hauter, Felipe C Canlas, Firli Yogiteten Sunaryoko, Gyanu Raja Maharjan, Md Mazharul Anowar, Harjyot Khosa, Yi-Roe Tan, Peiling Yap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dinesh KumarCommunity Medicine, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Sadarpur, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-4415
Ingo HauterClimate Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Felipe C CanlasWireless Access for Health Initiative, Tarlac, The Philippines.
Firli Yogiteten SunaryokoResearch and Development, Climate Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Gyanu Raja MaharjanRural Development (RD) Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Md Mazharul AnowarRural Development Academy (RDA), Bogura, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4369-8756
Harjyot KhosaInternational Planned Parenthood Federation, South Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Yi-Roe TanHealth AI, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-7330
Peiling YapHealth AI, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science (CS), a collaboration between people and scientists, is a viable approach utilizing citizens experiences in COVID-19 pandemic to manage future response. This study aimed to understand concepts, experiences, approaches, and sustainability issues of CS among citizens in five South and Southeast Asian countries. A qualitative study was carried out in Nepal, Bangladesh, India, Philippines, and Indonesia from October 2022 to March 2023. A total of 130 participants took part in four focus group discussions per country. Content analysis was done on narrative responses of participants for extraction of themes. Participants associated CS with the term "participation". Additionally, CS was related to "social responsibility" and "capacity building". During the COVID-19 pandemic, community participation was expressed by participants as a compliance measure with guidelines, helping to create awareness, and providing support (food, sanitizers, money, etc.) to fellow citizens. These experiences were related to CS and valued for personal achievement, satisfaction, and happiness with a chance to build social capital. Some participants expressed lack of confidence and language barriers as notable concerns while sharing their opinions with stakeholders (policymakers and researchers). Sustainability of CS activities was associated with creation of an organizations or networks, securing budget, incentivise participation, and assisting transportation. Participants considered CS as a community participation mechanism as a potentially viable and efficient manage future pandemics and public health crises.

Identifiers

PMID40839642
PMCPMC12370037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.