ArticlePloS one2025
Sexual dysfunctions related to use of antipsychotics: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSexual dysfunctions are a challenging side effect associated with antipsychotic treatment. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of overall sexual dysfunction, as well as the specific phases of sexual function affected by antipsychotic medications. Additionally, the analysis will explore the relationship between prolactin levels and sexual dysfunction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol has been registered in the database of the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42024573877. We will conduct a systematic search across electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and CINAHL, to identify relevant studies. Studies will be included if they meet predefined inclusion criteria, which include only controlled randomized trials assessing sexual functioning in patients receiving antipsychotic treatment. The antipsychotic medications of interest are amisulpride, aripiprazole, asenapine, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, chlorpromazine, clopenthixol, clozapine, droperidol, flupenthixol, fluphenazine, haloperidol, iloperidone, levomepromazine, loxapine, lurasidone, molindone, olanzapine, paliperidone, penfluridol, perphenazine, perazine, pimozide, prochlorperazine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, sulpiride, thiothixene, thioridazine, trifluoperazine, ziprasidone, zuclopenthixol and zotepine. The primary outcome is the overall prevalence of sexual dysfunction among patients undergoing antipsychotic treatment, while the secondary outcomes include the domains of sexual dysfunction (e.g., desire, arousal, orgasm) and serum prolactin levels. A network meta-analysis (NMA) will be performed using random effects to combine all available evidence for each outcome, aimed to provide a comprehensive ranking of different antipsychotics. NMA will be performed in R within a frequentist paradigm. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and RoB 2.0 will be used to assess the risk of bias in studies. We will evaluate the quality of the evidence contributing to network estimates for the primary outcomes using the GRADE framework, and key factors that may affect the observed effects will be analysed for consistency across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.