ArticlePloS one2025
Binocular visual performance and optical quality of trifocal intraocular lens in Chinese patients with high myopic cataract.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the visual performance and optical quality of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with high myopic cataracts.
methodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized cohort study. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery with binocular AcrySof IQ® PanOptix® TFNT00 IOL implantation were enrolled. Participants with axial length (AL) ≥ 26 mm were assigned to the high myopia group, while age- and sex-matched patients with AL < 26 mm in the control group. Key outcomes measured included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), intermediate and near visual acuity (UIVA, UNVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, visual quality (objective and subjective), and reading ability.
results58 eyes from 29 patients in the high myopia group and 56 eyes from 28 patients in the control group were included. Both groups showed significant improvements in visual acuity postoperatively although the UIVA and UNVA of patients with high myopia were significantly worse than those in the control group after 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year (both P < .05). The high myopia group had lower mean visual function-index scores for near-range activities and fewer photic phenomena (halo) than the control group (all P < .05). Preferred reading distance and speed did not differ significantly between the groups.
conclusionsTrifocal IOL implantation improved visual acuity in both groups. However, patients with high myopia experienced significantly poorer intermediate/near vision outcomes and also less complains about photic phenomena than controls. These findings support cautious patient selection and preoperative counseling for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.