Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839613›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The relative contributions of subjective and musical factors in music for sleep.

Rory Kirk, George Panoutsos, Maan van de Werken, Renee Timmers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rory KirkMuses, Mind, Machine, Department of Music, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-0271
George PanoutsosDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Maan van de WerkenSleepCogni, BrainTrain2020 Ltd., Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Renee TimmersMuses, Mind, Machine, Department of Music, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-0834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research into music for sleep has focused on describing the types of musical characteristics associated with such music. The current study aimed to increase understanding of sleep music by investigating subjective perceptions of listeners associated with music that is considered sleep inducing. A listening experiment asked participants to rate musical excerpts along subjective evaluation dimensions related to valence, arousal, and dissociation. Musical features of the stimuli presented were extracted to compare the relative contribution of subjective and objective aspects. Our results reveal important roles for valence and arousal, and highlight notions of comfort, liking, and dissociation that contribute to music that is perceived to be sleep inducing. The musical analysis largely conformed with previous research, with an emphasis on brightness. However, the subjective ratings overshadowed the musical features in predicting what music was perceived to be most sleep inducing. Our findings are relevant for music recommendation applications that rely on a features-based approach to selecting music to fulfil particular purposes. As applications increasingly emphasise personalisation, we have shown that an account of subjective appraisals is crucial to predict listeners' experiences, providing recommendations for individually targeted therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMusicSleepAcoustic StimulationAdultArousalFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40839613
PMCPMC12370070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.