ArticlePloS one2025
The relative contributions of subjective and musical factors in music for sleep.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research into music for sleep has focused on describing the types of musical characteristics associated with such music. The current study aimed to increase understanding of sleep music by investigating subjective perceptions of listeners associated with music that is considered sleep inducing. A listening experiment asked participants to rate musical excerpts along subjective evaluation dimensions related to valence, arousal, and dissociation. Musical features of the stimuli presented were extracted to compare the relative contribution of subjective and objective aspects. Our results reveal important roles for valence and arousal, and highlight notions of comfort, liking, and dissociation that contribute to music that is perceived to be sleep inducing. The musical analysis largely conformed with previous research, with an emphasis on brightness. However, the subjective ratings overshadowed the musical features in predicting what music was perceived to be most sleep inducing. Our findings are relevant for music recommendation applications that rely on a features-based approach to selecting music to fulfil particular purposes. As applications increasingly emphasise personalisation, we have shown that an account of subjective appraisals is crucial to predict listeners' experiences, providing recommendations for individually targeted therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.