ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting art university students' entrepreneurial intention: A hybrid SEM-ANN approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, academics and policymakers have increasingly focused on entrepreneurial behavior among university students. While existing studies have explored the entrepreneurial intention (EI) of students from various academic disciplines, few have specifically examined the EI of art university students. Based on the Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DOI) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study explores the factors influencing art university students' EI and assesses each factor's relative importance. This study employed a structural questionnaire to survey 273 students from three universities in Liaoning Province, China, measuring eight constructs: relative advantage (RA), observability (OB), compatibility (CO), entrepreneurial motivation (EM), entrepreneurial attitude (EA), subjective norms (SN), perceived behavioral control (PBC), and EI. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The results show that, among the direct significant predictors of EI, PBC has the strongest influence, followed by EA, SN, and EM. Additionally, all predictive constructs accounted for 60% of the variance in the EI of art university students. The ANN analysis revealed the following normalized importance ranking of all predictive constructs: PBC (100%), EA (70.8%), SN (57.6%), RA (43.1%), and EM (31.2%). This study not only fills the gap in research on the EI of art university students but also provides valuable insights for developing targeted strategies to foster entrepreneurship among this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.