ArticlePloS one2025
Multi-task deep learning for predicting metabolic syndrome from retinal fundus images in a Japanese health checkup dataset.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinal fundus images provide a noninvasive window into systemic health, offering opportunities for early detection of metabolic disorders such as metabolic syndrome (METS).
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a deep learning model to predict METS from fundus images obtained during routine health checkups, leveraging a multi-task learning approach.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 5,000 fundus images from Japanese health checkup participants. Convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained to classify METS status, incorporating fundus-specific data augmentation strategies and auxiliary regression tasks targeting clinical parameters such as abdominal circumference (AC). Model performance was evaluated using validation accuracy, test accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsModels employing fundus-specific augmentation demonstrated more stable convergence and superior validation accuracy compared to general-purpose augmentation. Incorporating AC as an auxiliary task further enhanced performance across architectures. The final ensemble model with test-time augmentation achieved a test accuracy of 0.696 and an AUC of 0.73178.
conclusionCombining multi-task learning, fundus-specific data augmentation, and ensemble prediction substantially improves deep learning-based METS classification from fundus images. This approach may offer a practical, noninvasive screening tool for metabolic syndrome in general health checkup settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.