ArticlePloS one2025
A hybrid approach for forecasting peak expiratory flow rate in asthma patients using combined linear regression and random forest model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a frequent and long-lasting disorder associated with airway inflammation. The disease severity may lead to serious health concerns and even mortality. In this work, we propose a novel hybrid approach using machine learning models and similarity measurement technique with the aim of precise peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) estimation for asthma trigger assessment. The random forest model was first utilized to classify the PEFR percentile zones on unseen data. Then, two linear regression models following thresholds of <50% and >=50% were hypothesized and trained to achieve better outcomes than a single standalone model. Hence, the input is diverted to the relevant model for prediction based on classification results. Furthermore, a string-matching technique has been proposed to obtain reference outcomes in addition to yesterday's PEFR. Finally, a supplementary linear regression model is used to make predictions based on input of two prediction values and one PEFR value from the previous day. The proposed model is evaluated on a dataset of 25 patients, each with 2 to 3 months of recordings, on average. The findings showed reduced mean and random absolute error of 27.064 L/min and 1.34%, respectively, using the suggested model, compared to 79.794 L/min and 4.42% error rates by the standalone linear regression model on five-fold cross-validation. The outcome indicates that the proposed hybrid algorithm accurately predicts asthma-trigger events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.