ArticlePloS one2025
Improvement in risk prediction for patients with atrial fibrillation and intermediate-risk CHA2DS2-VASc score utilizing highly sensitive cardiac troponin T.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Opportunistic and systematic screening for atrial fibrillation in adults aged ≥ 65 years in primary care: a systematic review of randomized and cluster randomized trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- CDK7 as a Potential Exploratory Biomarker for Distinguishing Acute Myocardial Infarction Subtypes via DDR Pathways: Evidence From a Bangladeshi Cohort.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Clinical Biomarkers Based on the Pathophysiology of Arrhythmias.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommend a clinical risk assessment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, scores such as the CHA2DS2-VASc score show only a modest performance for prediction of adverse endpoints.
methodsThis retrospective single-center all-comer study uses data from the Heidelberg Registry of Atrial Fibrillation of 9,995 patients with non-valvular AF presenting to the emergency department (ED) of the University Hospital of Heidelberg from June 2009 until March 2020. Per CHA2DS2-VASc, risk was classified as low (0 point in men, ≤ 1 point in females), intermediate, or high (≥2 points in men and ≥3 points in females). The predictive performance of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, with and without highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), was evaluated for a composite endpoint comprising stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or all-cause mortality.
resultsPerformance of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for the prediction of the composite endpoint was poor Area under the curve (AUC): 0.648 (95%CI: 0.638-0.657) particularly in patients at intermediate-risk AUC: 0.542 (95%CI: 0.508-0.575). Adding hs-cTnT improved discrimination substantially in intermediate-risk patients (AUC: 0.778, 95% CI: 0.748-0.805). Notably, no events occurred in intermediate-risk patients with undetectable hs-cTnT (<5 ng/L).
conclusionIn patients with AF at intermediate thromboembolic risk, the addition of hs-cTnT to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score enhances prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Hs-cTnT may help identify patients who could benefit from anticoagulation, while also identifying a low-risk subgroup unlikely to experience events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.