Observational studyEpilepsia open2025
Effectiveness of perampanel as the only adjunctive anti-seizure medication in adults: Final results from the observational PERPRISE study in Germany.
Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202159 (PERPRISE), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PERPRISE: A Prospective Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Perampanel (Fycompa®) as Only Add-on Treatment in Patients With Primary or Secondarily Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe PERPRISE study (Study 509; NCT04202159) was a prospective, observational, non-interventional study in a real-world setting in Germany. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of perampanel as the only adjunctive treatment for 12 months in patients aged ≥18 years with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in clinical practice.
methodsAdult patients with FBTCS or GTCS received perampanel as an adjunctive therapy to anti-seizure medication (ASM) monotherapy (add-on therapy) or as a substitute for one ASM in dual therapy (substitution therapy) per the approved indication. The primary endpoint was the 12-month retention rate of perampanel; the secondary endpoints were the 6-month retention rate, seizure freedom for FBTCS or GTCS at 12 months, and safety and tolerability. Exploratory endpoints included efficacy assessments by seizure type at 6 and 12 months and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsOf the 185 patients enrolled in the study, 183 patients were included in the full analysis set (add-on, 86 patients; substitution, 96 patients; missing, 1 patient). The 12-month retention rate was 66.7% (add-on, 67.4%; substitution, 66.7%); the 6-month retention rate was 80.3% (add-on, 82.6%; substitution, 78.1%). At 12 months, the seizure-freedom rate for FBTCS or GTCS was 42.3% (add-on, 51.7%; substitution, 35.1%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 44.0% of patients; 6.0% of patients reported serious TEAEs, and 16.5% of patients withdrew from the study due to TEAEs. Treatment with perampanel did not adversely affect cognitive function in patients with FBTCS or GTCS, and improvements in quality of life were reported by patients at both 6 and 12 months following perampanel initiation. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings from the PERPRISE study suggest that perampanel as an only adjunctive therapy is associated with favorable retention rates and good tolerability in patients with FBTCS or GTCS in a real-world clinical setting in Germany. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy often take multiple treatments to control their seizures. It is important to look at how well they work in everyday life. This study looked at adult patients in Germany taking perampanel added to one other epilepsy treatment. After 1 year, 58 of 137 patients suffering from the most severe type of seizure were free of them. Side effects occurred in 80 patients (most commonly dizziness, fatigue, and nausea) and caused 30 of them to withdraw from treatment. Perampanel was effective and did not seem to negatively affect patients' thinking ability or quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.