Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839459›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsia open2025

Effectiveness of perampanel as the only adjunctive anti-seizure medication in adults: Final results from the observational PERPRISE study in Germany.

Bernhard J Steinhoff, Tobias Goldmann, Edgar Kockelmann, Yaroslav Winter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202159 (PERPRISE), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04202159 completednot on this map

PERPRISE: A Prospective Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Perampanel (Fycompa®) as Only Add-on Treatment in Patients With Primary or Secondarily Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

TypeobservationalSponsorEisai GmbHRan2020 to 2023Enrolled187ConditionsSeizuresArmsPerampanel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernhard J SteinhoffKork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-5862
Tobias GoldmannEisai GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-9144
Edgar KockelmannEisai GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Yaroslav WinterDepartment of Neurology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-4038

Funding

Eisai GmbH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe PERPRISE study (Study 509; NCT04202159) was a prospective, observational, non-interventional study in a real-world setting in Germany. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of perampanel as the only adjunctive treatment for 12 months in patients aged ≥18 years with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in clinical practice.

methodsAdult patients with FBTCS or GTCS received perampanel as an adjunctive therapy to anti-seizure medication (ASM) monotherapy (add-on therapy) or as a substitute for one ASM in dual therapy (substitution therapy) per the approved indication. The primary endpoint was the 12-month retention rate of perampanel; the secondary endpoints were the 6-month retention rate, seizure freedom for FBTCS or GTCS at 12 months, and safety and tolerability. Exploratory endpoints included efficacy assessments by seizure type at 6 and 12 months and patient-reported outcomes.

resultsOf the 185 patients enrolled in the study, 183 patients were included in the full analysis set (add-on, 86 patients; substitution, 96 patients; missing, 1 patient). The 12-month retention rate was 66.7% (add-on, 67.4%; substitution, 66.7%); the 6-month retention rate was 80.3% (add-on, 82.6%; substitution, 78.1%). At 12 months, the seizure-freedom rate for FBTCS or GTCS was 42.3% (add-on, 51.7%; substitution, 35.1%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 44.0% of patients; 6.0% of patients reported serious TEAEs, and 16.5% of patients withdrew from the study due to TEAEs. Treatment with perampanel did not adversely affect cognitive function in patients with FBTCS or GTCS, and improvements in quality of life were reported by patients at both 6 and 12 months following perampanel initiation. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings from the PERPRISE study suggest that perampanel as an only adjunctive therapy is associated with favorable retention rates and good tolerability in patients with FBTCS or GTCS in a real-world clinical setting in Germany. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy often take multiple treatments to control their seizures. It is important to look at how well they work in everyday life. This study looked at adult patients in Germany taking perampanel added to one other epilepsy treatment. After 1 year, 58 of 137 patients suffering from the most severe type of seizure were free of them. Side effects occurred in 80 patients (most commonly dizziness, fatigue, and nausea) and caused 30 of them to withdraw from treatment. Perampanel was effective and did not seem to negatively affect patients' thinking ability or quality of life.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsPyridonesSeizuresAdolescentAdultAgedDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridonesadjunctive therapyepilepsygeneralized tonic–clonic seizurespatient‐reported outcomesperampanelreal world

Identifiers

PMID40839459
PMCPMC12514367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.