ReviewPain management2025
Late response to anti-CGRP therapy for migraine.
Review in Pain management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder affecting 1 billion people worldwide. Traditional preventive drugs showed low efficacy and poor tolerability. Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptors offer a new efficacious and safe therapeutic option for migraine patients. According to randomized controlled trials, these disease-specific drugs reduce migraine frequency by ≥ 50% within 3 months. However, real-world studies show that some patients require a longer treatment duration (6 or 12 months). This narrative review aimed to investigate the occurrence of late and ultra-late responses to anti-CGRP therapy, exploring their potential mechanisms and clinical significance. A literature search was performed [PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar; publications up to July 2025] to identify relevant studies for this narrative review. Across 10 real-world studies, a proportion of patients who did not respond at 3 months achieved a meaningful clinical response at later time points: some between 3 and 6 months ("late responders") and others between 6 and 12 months ("ultra-late responders"). Around one-third of initial non-responders improved by 6 months, and among those who remained non-responsive at that point, a further proportion benefited by 12 months. The pathophysiological mechanism behind late response is a field of investigation, and the interaction of anti-CGRPs on the process of central desensitization seems to be crucial. Our review underscores the need to extend treatment beyond the typical 3-month period to attain meaningful benefits from anti-CGRP therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.