Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839373›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2025

Impact of a Weight Loss Intervention on 1-Year Weight Change in Women With Stage II/III Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the Breast Cancer Weight Loss (BWEL) Trial.

Jennifer A Ligibel, Karla V Ballman, Linda McCall, Pamela J Goodwin, Catherine M Alfano, Vanessa Bernstein, Tracy E Crane, Linda M Delahanty, Elizabeth Frank, Olwen Hahn and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02750826 (Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Weight Loss in Adjuvant Treatment of Overweight and Obese Women with Early Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02750826 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Weight Loss in Adjuvant Treatment of Overweight and Obese Women with Early Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2016 to 2030Enrolled3,177ConditionsBreast CarcinomaArmsHealth Education Program, Weight Loss Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Breast Cancer and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Jennifer A LigibelDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Karla V BallmanAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Linda McCallAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Pamela J GoodwinUniversity of Toronto/Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine M AlfanoNorthwell Health Cancer Institute, New York, New York.
Vanessa BernsteinUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Tracy E CraneSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Linda M DelahantyMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Elizabeth FrankDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Olwen HahnAlliance Protocol Operations Office, Chicago, Illinois.
Dawn L HershmanColumbia University, New York, New York.
Judith O HopkinsNovant Health Cancer Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Melinda IrwinYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Erica L MayerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lori MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Linda NebelingDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Marian L NeuhouserFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Electra D PaskettJames Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Patricia A SpearsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Vered StearnsWeill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Cynthia A ThomsonMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Anna WeissUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Julia WhiteKansas University Medical Center, Kansas City.
Thomas A WaddenUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Eric P WinerYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Clifford HudisWeill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ann H PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lisa A CareyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Michael Jason de la Cruz · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Obesity is associated with a higher risk of recurrence, mortality, comorbidities, treatment-related adverse effects, and poor quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Scalable interventions are needed to promote weight loss in this population. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a remotely delivered weight loss intervention (WLI) on weight change at 1 year in patients with breast cancer and obesity and to explore factors associated with weight change. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Breast Cancer Weight Loss trial is a phase 3, randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of a telephone-based WLI on invasive disease-free survival and other outcomes in women with obesity and early breast cancer at 637 sites across the US and Canada. Participants were enrolled to the study between August 2016 and February 2021. Participants included women with stage II to III, ERBB2-negative breast cancer and a body mass index (BMI) of 27 or higher. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a 2-year, telephone-based WLI plus health education or health education alone control group. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point for this prespecified secondary analysis was weight change at 1 year. Weight was measured at baseline and 1 year, and changes in weight were compared between groups. Weight change was evaluated with a linear mixed-effects model including treatment group, weight over time, a time-by-group interaction, menopausal status, race and ethnicity, and hormone receptor status. Results: A total of 3180 women with breast cancer and BMI of 27 and higher were included in the study; 1591 were randomized to the WLI and 1589 to the control group. At baseline, the mean (SD) age of participants was 53.4 (10.6), and the mean (SD) BMI was 34.4 (5.6). The racial and ethnic breakdown included 406 (12.8%) Black, 231 (7.3%) Hispanic or Latino, 2906 (91.4%) non-Hispanic, and 2555 (80.3%) White participants. WLI participants lost a mean of 4.3 kg (95% CI 3.9-4.6 kg), or 4.7% (95% CI, 4.3%-5.0%) of baseline body weight at 1 year vs control participants, who gained 0.9 kg (95% CI, 0.5-1.3 kg), or 1.0% (95% CI 0.1%-1.4%) of baseline body weight (P < .001). Participants randomized to WLI experienced significant weight loss (vs control group participants) across demographic and tumor factors. WLI effect differed significantly by menopausal status, with postmenopausal participants having greater weight loss than premenopausal participants, and by race and ethnicity, with Black and Hispanic participants having less weight loss compared to other races and ethnicities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, a telephone-based WLI induced significant weight loss in patients with breast cancer with overweight and obesity across demographic and treatment factors. Further follow-up of the Breast Cancer Weight Loss trial will evaluate whether the WLI improves disease outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02750826.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsObesityWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingQuality of LifeTelephoneTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40839373
PMCPMC12371550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.