ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2025
Age-Specific Risk of Second Primary Malignant Neoplasm After Radioactive Iodine Treatment for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.
Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal spectrum of approach in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (an updated analysis).Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Radioactive iodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer has been associated with second primary malignant neoplasms, but age-specific risks remain poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the association of age with increased risk of second primary malignant neoplasm after radioactive iodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from 8 cancer registries in the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for 1975 to 2021. Patients who received radioactive iodine treatment for DTC were identified; those with fewer than 2 years of follow-up, missing follow-up data, or distant metastases at diagnosis were excluded. Included patients were categorized into 3 age groups: 15 to 44, 45 to 64, and 65 years or older. Among 5-year survivors, median (IQR) follow-up time was 14.7 (8.6-24.0) years in the 15- to 44-year age group; 8.3 (6.4-11.4) years in the 45- to 64-year group; and 9.3 (6.9-12.7) years in the 65 years or older group. Data were analyzed from May to July 2024. Exposure: Radioactive iodine vs no radioactive iodine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relative risks (RR) and 95% CIs for solid and hematologic second primary malignant neoplasms, calculated using multivariable Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, and latency. Results: The study sample comprised 72 412 patients with nonmetastatic DTC, of whom 28 432 (39%) were age 15 to 44 years; 34 009 (47%), age 45 to 64 years; and 9971 (14%), 65 years or older. In the 15- to 44-year age group, radioactive iodine was associated with an increased risk of hematologic cancers (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.80), specifically myeloma (RR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.68-10.62). In the 45- to 64-year age group, the analyses showed increased risks of prostate cancer (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.10-2.37), salivary gland cancer (RR, 10.22; 95% CI, 1.27-82.24), and nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.34-5.89). The overall risk of a solid second primary malignant neoplasm was not elevated (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.76-1.16), but hematologic second primary malignant neoplasm risk was elevated (RR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.14-2.60). Patients in the group that was 65 years and older showed elevated risks of stomach (RR, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.05-15.81), esophagus (RR, 11.42; 95% CI, 1.40-93.3), nonepithelial skin cancers (RR, 10.52; 95% CI, 1.09-88.77), and acute myeloid leukemia (RR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.15-9.24). The overall risk of a solid second primary malignant neoplasm was elevated (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.59-2.21), whereas risk of hematologic malignant neoplasm was not (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.97-1.87). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that the risk of radioactive iodine-associated second primary malignant neoplasm among patients who received radioactive iodine for DTC varies significantly by age group, with distinct patterns in middle-aged compared with older adults. These findings suggest a need for age-specific surveillance strategies in radioactive iodine-treated DTC survivors. Further research is needed to establish optimal screening protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.