Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839357›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2025

Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease After Cisplatin Treatment Using Population-Level Data.

Robert C Grant, Jiang Chen He, Ning Liu, Sho Podolsky, Faiyaz Notta, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Steven Gallinger, Andrea Knezevic, Sheron Latcha, Edgar Jaimes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robert C GrantPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jiang Chen HePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ning LiuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sho PodolskyICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faiyaz NottaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marzyeh GhassemiMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Steven GallingerOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea KnezevicEpidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sheron LatchaRenal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Edgar JaimesRenal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abhijat KitchluPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelvin ChanICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cisplatin is a widely used treatment for cancer that can permanently damage the kidneys. Treatment modifications and other strategies may prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients at risk; however, the incidence and predictability of CKD following cisplatin treatment remain poorly understood. Objective: To characterize the incidence of CKD after cisplatin treatment and evaluate prediction models. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based prognostic study, prediction models were developed based on a retrospective cohort study of patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy for nonhematologic cancer in an outpatient setting between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. Models were tested on a temporal-test cohort of patients from Ontario, Canada, who started treatment between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, and an external-test cohort of patients from a single center in the United States. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2021 to May 7, 2025. Exposures: Predictive features included demographics, cancer diagnosis, cisplatin dose and schedule, comorbidities, laboratory testing, and patient-reported symptoms. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes were CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the eGFR after cisplatin treatment. Measures included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the mean absolute error (MAE). Results: The population-level cohort included 9521 patients (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 4841 men [50.8%]). Among the 9010 patients without pretreatment CKD, 1228 (13.6%) developed CKD, 81 (0.9%) developed grade 4 or worse CKD, and 16 (0.18%) required dialysis. The eGFR decreased by a mean of 8.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, 7.8-8.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). A simple spline-based regression model based solely on the pretreatment eGFR predicted posttreatment CKD in the temporal-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]) and the external-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]). Similarly, the posttreatment eGFR was predicted by a spline regression based solely on the pretreatment eGFR (temporal-test MAE, 12.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, 12.3-13.0 mL/min/1.73 m2]; external-test MAE, 14.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, 13.2-15.5 mL/min/1.73 m2]). Complex machine learning systems incorporating all features failed to improve predictions over the univariable models. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that cisplatin treatment was followed by a predictable decrease in the eGFR, placing patients with a lower baseline eGFR at the highest risk of CKD. A simple model based on the pretreatment eGFR predicts CKD risk and could guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCisplatinNeoplasmsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID40839357
PMCPMC12371548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.