ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2025
Cataract Surgery in Cognitive Impairment: Navigating the Accessibility Challenge in European Healthcare.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review examines the challenges of providing cataract surgery to people living with cognitive impairment within European healthcare systems. It highlights the significant unmet need for improved ophthalmological management of this vulnerable population, given the established link between visual impairment, cognitive decline, and quality of life. While the benefits of cataract surgery in improving vision and cognition are well-documented, significant inconsistencies exist across European healthcare systems regarding protocols and access. The review examines the relationship between cognitive impairment and cataract surgery outcomes, identifies gaps in current practices, and proposes potential solutions to improve access and outcomes for this patient group, emphasizing the need for person-centered care, integrated pathways, and improved pre- and post-operative management. Ultimately, the authors advocate for a more coordinated and holistic approach involving ophthalmologists, geriatricians, and cognitive impairment specialists to ensure comprehensive care for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.