ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Definition of parameters and thresholds to detect MYCN amplification in retinoblastomas.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinoblastoma is a malignant childhood neoplasm where MYCN amplification defines a subset of tumors with worse prognosis. FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) represents a fast and reliable method to measure gene copy numbers in various tumors but has not yet been systematically evaluated in retinoblastoma. In this study, we define criteria for FISH detection of MYCN amplification in a systematic unbiased approach by using a well characterized series of 44 clinical retinoblastoma samples. We (i) determined potential measurements and parameters by a comprehensive literature review, (ii) analyzed a retrospective cohort of samples with known MYCN amplification, (iii) determined statistically measurements and cut-offs, which allow reliable detection of amplified tumors, and (iv) applied these criteria to a prospective cohort. We demonstrate that average gene copy number (AVGCN) of MYCN/cell, MYCN/CEN2 ratio, and MYCN-CEN2 difference reveal the lowest statistical variance in amplified samples, if at least 50 cells were counted. The combination of these three parameters and cut-offs, namely AVGCN ≥ 10, MYCN/CEN2 ratio ≥ 3, and MYCN-CEN2 difference ≥ 8, allowed a reliable distinction between amplified and non-amplified cases. The prevalence of MYCN-amplified cases was 4/33 (12.1%) among prospective clinical samples indicating a higher percentage of positive tumors than previously reported. Our data provide the first evidence for well-grounded MYCN FISH criteria in retinoblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.