ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025
Improving Accurate Detection of Mental Health Treatment Needs for Youth Through a Standardized Feedback Report.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence-based assessments (EBAs) are key to accurately detecting youth who would benefit from exposure therapy (EXP), but EBA is underused, and clinicians struggle to know when EXP is appropriate. Improving clinician case conceptualization may improve appropriate use of EXP. We tested whether viewing a simulated feedback report synthesizing results of standardized assessments and implicated treatment recommendations would impact clinicians' case conceptualizations. Using a survey design, 102 clinicians (M age = 36.85, 85% female; 92% master's degree) were randomized to one of four conditions in which they read one of two clinical vignettes describing a teen with either clear or vague youth anxiety symptoms. They then were shown one of two feedback reports suggesting anxiety as the primary treatment target and recommending EXP or a report showing a non-anxiety target. Clinicians who viewed the feedback report suggesting anxiety as the primary target tended to maintain or strengthen their ratings of anxiety as a primary treatment target and were more likely to state they would use EXP as a primary intervention strategy; effects were stronger when the initial case vignette described vague symptoms. Overall, clinicians rated the perceived utility of the report highly. Results of this analog study suggest a diagnostic feedback report may be highly acceptable and impact clinician case conceptualizations for anxious youth. Future work to develop and test this feedback report further is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40839297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.