ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025
Stepped Care Versus Stratified Care for Youth with Anxiety Disorders: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06016907 (A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Stepped vs Stratified Care for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Stepped vs Stratified Care for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From profiles to precision: incorporating the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to inform treatment planning in outpatient psychiatry.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Deep learning driven clustering of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) profiles in student-athletes: implications for precision and stratified mental health support.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Assessing reliable change, MCID, treatment response, and remission using the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) in youth with anxiety disorders.Journal of anxiety disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are common in children and adolescents, but access to evidence-based treatment is limited. Most clinical guidelines recommend stratified care, where less complex patients are offered low intensity interventions and complex patients more intensive options. Stepped care, where all patients initially receive low-intensity treatment, has gained traction due to its potential cost-effectiveness. Research on care models for youth with anxiety disorders is very limited. In this pre-registered (NCT06016907) pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), we examined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth with anxiety disorders. In stepped care, all began with internet-delivered CBT. In stratified care, complex cases (based on a baseline risk score incorporating symptom severity, co-existing disorders, functional impairment, and family conflict) started with in-person CBT. Non-responders in both groups were offered in-person CBT. Over six months, 51 youth with anxiety disorders were enrolled (mean age = 14.18 years, range = 9.25-17.50; 71% girls), with 80% meeting criteria for more than one mental disorder. Treatment adherence (≥ 50% completion) was 78-84% across interventions. Masked outcome assessments were attended by 96% of participants. No serious adverse effects were reported. At the primary endpoint, 40% of participants in stepped care and 75% in stratified care were classified as treatment responders. However, the trial was not powered to detect efficacy differences, and no between-group comparisons were conducted. Results indicate that a definitive trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth anxiety disorders is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40839295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.