ArticleJAMA network open2025
Ambient Documentation Technology in Clinician Experience of Documentation Burden and Burnout.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cognitive Workload and Mental Burden in Health Care Professionals Interacting With AI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-driven work systems and employee burnout: a systematic review of mechanisms, moderators, and a dynamic meta-system framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Evidence on artificial intelligence-assisted clinical documentation and healthcare workers' emotional wellbeing at work: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging the trust-adoption gap for AI scribes in rural communities: A machine learning approach using the 2024 Canadian digital health survey.International journal of medical informatics · 2026Article
- Ambient AI Scribe Technology and Perceived Documentation Efficiency Among Surgeons: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Grounded ophthalmic AI beyond the electronic health record trap: a critical narrative review.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Review
- Ambient AI Scribes as Emerging Infrastructure in the Learning Health System.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Generated Electronic Medical Record Summarization in Breast Surgical Oncology.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond Transparency : Ethical Note Obligations, Documentation Burden, and the Ethical Adoption of AI-Assisted Documentation.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- For the record: a narrative review of ambient voice technology in clinical documentation for dentistry and wider healthcare.British dental journal · 2026Review
- Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Actions Reported by Physicians With Large Improvements in Burnout and Professional Fulfillment.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Accelerating ambient AI scribe enterprise-scale deployment: Cleveland Clinic's novel approach to health system-industry partnership.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Conversational AI should fill the white space in mental health care, not replace humans.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Psychiatry Training.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Ambient AI for Inpatient Documentation: A Qualitative Study with Junior Doctors.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Ambient AI Scribes and Emergency Department Documentation Burden: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Thinking critically about AI documentation quality in primary care.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Documentation burden is associated with clinician burnout. To address documentation burden, Mass General Brigham (MGB) in Somerville, Massachusetts, and Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia, have piloted ambient documentation technology (ADT), which develops artificial intelligence-drafted clinical notes from clinician-patient conversations. Objective: To examine the prevalence of ADT use and its association with clinicians' experience of documentation burden and burnout before and after use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study included clinicians who used ADT for at least 42 days and responded to both the pre- and postsurveys (onboarded February 27 to July 31, 2024, at MGB and July 19, 2023, to July 31, 2024, at Emory). Exposure: Ambient documentation technology. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the proportion of self-reported ADT usage, change in proportion of clinicians meeting the criteria for burnout or a positive outcome of their documentation practice associated with their well-being, and free-text survey comments. Results: Across MGB and Emory, 1430 clinicians, including 873 at MGB (573 clinicians [65.6%] practiced for >10 years; 478 women [54.8%]) and 557 at Emory (286 clinicians [51.3%] practiced for >10 years; 309 women [55.5%]) were enrolled in ADT pilot studies. The majority of clinicians were physicians (688 [78.8%] at MGB and 418 [75.0%] at Emory). Approximately equal proportions of clinicians practiced in primary care (192 [22.0%] at MGB and 156 [28.0%] at Emory). The response rates to relevant components of the MGB survey was 30.4% (265 of 873 respondents) for the 42-day midsurvey and 22.0% (192 of 873 respondents) for the 84-day postsurvey; for the Emory survey, the postsurvey response rate was 11.1% (62 of 557 respondents). A total of 128 of 264 MGB survey respondents (48.5%) had self-reported using ADT for at least 50% of their patient visits, while 27 of 62 Emory respondents (43.5%) self-reported usage for most or all of their visits. The proportion of MGB clinicians reporting burnout (Professional Fulfillment Index overall burnout score >1.33) decreased from 50.6% to 29.4% (χ2 = 42.4; P < .001) at 42 days and decreased from 52.6% to 30.7% (χ2 = 32.7; P < .001) at 84 days. The proportion of Emory clinicians reporting a positive impact of their documentation practice on well-being (defined as a score of 3-4 for positive or very positive) improved from 1.6% to 32.3% (χ2 = 19.0; P < .001). Qualitative analysis of free-text survey comments revealed that clinicians found improved joy in practice with ADT use and saw opportunities for improved ADT functionality. Conclusions and Relevance: Across these survey studies, ADT use was associated with reductions in burnout and increases in perceived well-being. These findings suggest that ADT may enhance clinicians' documentation-related experience and reduce burnout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.