Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839265›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Ambient Documentation Technology in Clinician Experience of Documentation Burden and Burnout.

Jacqueline G You, Reema H Dbouk, Adam Landman, David Y Ting, Sayon Dutta, Julie C Wang, Amanda J Centi, Molly Macfarlane, Eran Bechor, Jonathan Letourneau and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Psychiatry Training.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Jacqueline G YouDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Reema H DboukDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Adam LandmanDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
David Y TingDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Sayon DuttaDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Julie C WangHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Amanda J CentiDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Molly MacfarlaneDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Eran BechorDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Jonathan LetourneauDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Gabrielle Choo-KangDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Esther H KimDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Cordula MageeDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Brian J LangDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Laura AngeloDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Jackson OlinNortheastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michelle FritsDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine IannacconeDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angela RuiDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ivana SalmikovaDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christopher HollandEmory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bryan BlanchetteEmory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rachel SilvermanEmory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia.
David W BatesDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Lisa RotensteinDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca G MishurisDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING-MEDICAL INFORMATICS 90T15LM007092 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Nils Gehlenborg · 1992 to 2026
$32.8M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Documentation burden is associated with clinician burnout. To address documentation burden, Mass General Brigham (MGB) in Somerville, Massachusetts, and Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia, have piloted ambient documentation technology (ADT), which develops artificial intelligence-drafted clinical notes from clinician-patient conversations. Objective: To examine the prevalence of ADT use and its association with clinicians' experience of documentation burden and burnout before and after use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study included clinicians who used ADT for at least 42 days and responded to both the pre- and postsurveys (onboarded February 27 to July 31, 2024, at MGB and July 19, 2023, to July 31, 2024, at Emory). Exposure: Ambient documentation technology. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the proportion of self-reported ADT usage, change in proportion of clinicians meeting the criteria for burnout or a positive outcome of their documentation practice associated with their well-being, and free-text survey comments. Results: Across MGB and Emory, 1430 clinicians, including 873 at MGB (573 clinicians [65.6%] practiced for >10 years; 478 women [54.8%]) and 557 at Emory (286 clinicians [51.3%] practiced for >10 years; 309 women [55.5%]) were enrolled in ADT pilot studies. The majority of clinicians were physicians (688 [78.8%] at MGB and 418 [75.0%] at Emory). Approximately equal proportions of clinicians practiced in primary care (192 [22.0%] at MGB and 156 [28.0%] at Emory). The response rates to relevant components of the MGB survey was 30.4% (265 of 873 respondents) for the 42-day midsurvey and 22.0% (192 of 873 respondents) for the 84-day postsurvey; for the Emory survey, the postsurvey response rate was 11.1% (62 of 557 respondents). A total of 128 of 264 MGB survey respondents (48.5%) had self-reported using ADT for at least 50% of their patient visits, while 27 of 62 Emory respondents (43.5%) self-reported usage for most or all of their visits. The proportion of MGB clinicians reporting burnout (Professional Fulfillment Index overall burnout score >1.33) decreased from 50.6% to 29.4% (χ2 = 42.4; P < .001) at 42 days and decreased from 52.6% to 30.7% (χ2 = 32.7; P < .001) at 84 days. The proportion of Emory clinicians reporting a positive impact of their documentation practice on well-being (defined as a score of 3-4 for positive or very positive) improved from 1.6% to 32.3% (χ2 = 19.0; P < .001). Qualitative analysis of free-text survey comments revealed that clinicians found improved joy in practice with ADT use and saw opportunities for improved ADT functionality. Conclusions and Relevance: Across these survey studies, ADT use was associated with reductions in burnout and increases in perceived well-being. These findings suggest that ADT may enhance clinicians' documentation-related experience and reduce burnout.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBurnout, ProfessionalDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsPhysiciansAdultFemaleGeorgiaHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40839265
PMCPMC12371510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.