Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839243›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Brain metastases from ovarian cancer: neuroradiological profile and survival overview of neurosurgical cases.

Carolina Giordano, Carolina Maria Sassu, Claudia Marchetti, Giulia Guerri, Andrea De Filippis, Serena Gulotta, Giammaria Marziali, Giorgia Russo, Amato Infante, Pier Paolo Mattogno and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Carolina GiordanoDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. carolinagiordano91@gmail.com.
Carolina Maria SassuDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Claudia MarchettiDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giulia GuerriDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea De FilippisDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Serena GulottaDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giammaria MarzialiDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giorgia RussoDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Amato InfanteDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Pier Paolo MattognoUOC Neurochirurgia, Istituto di Neurochirurgia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro OliviUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Anna FagottiDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Evis SalaDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Benedetta GuiDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simona GaudinoDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to identify the radiological features of brain metastases (BM) from ovarian cancer (OC) and correlate them to clinical and genetic data. Additionally, the impact of neurosurgery on patient survival is evaluated. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted, involving 106 patients with BM from OC. Neuroradiological imaging was available for 66 patients. The data collected were analyzed using linear correlation and ANOVA tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for survival analysis. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsThe most prevalent histological subtypes were high grade serous (90%) OC. The main neuroradiological feature was necrosis (79%). BM were multiple in 56% of cases, with a prevalent distribution in the cerebral hemispheres (80.30%). Additional neuroradiological features included a volume greater than 1000 mm³ (71%), hemosiderin deposits on SWI (67%), abundant perilesional edema (53%), and the presence of hemorrhage (15%). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of BM was 781.5 × 10^-6 mm²/s, while relative cerebral volume (rCBV) was lower in patients with posterior fossa BM (p = 0.049). Neurological symptoms were present in 39% of cases, and a linear correlation was identified between neurological symptoms and both tumor volume (p = 0.0008) and the presence of necrosis (p = 0.04). The BRCAm was associated to longer survival (p = 0.04) and was associated with less perilesional edema (OR = 0.145, CI: 0.027-0.776). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an overall survival (OS) of 46 months in BRCAwt patients who underwent neurosurgery, vs. 37 months in patients who did not (p = 0.03). Cox analysis identified BRCAm status, performance status, post-BM chemotherapy, and CNS-only disease as independent predictors of better survival; surgery was not significant.

conclusionThe current study supports the established protective value of the BRCA mutation and suggests that neurosurgical treatment of BM after a comprehensive evaluation may improve survival, even in BRCAwt patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The critical need for early detection of BMs that are appropriate for surgical intervention is highlighted, as timely action can greatly improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgical ProceduresOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBRCA1 ProteinBrain metastasesMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroradiological featuresNeurosurgeryOvarian carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.