SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Takeaways from meta-analysis: indications of combinational treatments for glioblastoma.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with brain cancers are diagnosed based on MRI in the clinical setting while molecular signatures offer potential therapeutic targets. The necessity to re-form molecular and imaging information motivated our meta-analysis to decipher the correlation between the MRI-classified tumor locations, gene expression, and protein signatures in GBM.
methodsWe analyzed spatial and omics data alongside the assessment of post-translational modifications. We first utilized MRI data to classify GBM into 4 groups. We then integrated imaging groups with RNA-Seq and proteomic data to determine the association between tumor locations, gene signatures, and protein abundance. Furthermore, we scrutinized independent measurements of post-translational modifications in each group of MRI-classified GBM.
resultsThe coherent layer of imaging and molecular data collectively showed the dysregulation of cell cycle, ECM organization, immune infiltration or surveillance in all GBM cases regardless of tumor locations. Several neuronal and synaptic-specific genes were differentially altered, indicative of aberrant neuroactivity in GBM. These dysregulated genes and networks provided druggable targets that led to small compounds identification, possessing cytotoxicity against primary GBM and spanning histological boundaries. Our analysis also revealed lesion-specific molecular signatures in each group of GBM, suggesting pathological features uniquely in subgroups of GBM with prognostic or therapeutic potential. Moreover, alterations in post-translational modifications would be noteworthy to explore clinical applications.
conclusionsDeliverables from our meta-analysis hold the potential to inform therapeutic intervention. Despite heterogeneity in GBM, our findings implicate new directions of emerging treatments that may be used as concomitants to chemo-, radio- or immunological therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40839241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.