ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Iron-deficiency anemia evaluation and treatment in hospitalized cancer patients: a feasibility study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A prospective study of intravenous iron effectiveness on quality of life and functional outcomes in patients with cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCancer-associated anemia is multifactorial, resulting from both the malignancy itself and its treatment. It is frequently accompanied by absolute or functional iron deficiency. While intravenous (IV) iron is a well-established treatment in outpatients, evidence is lacking in cancer patients hospitalized for acute complications. We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the practicality of administering intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in this population.
methodsThis feasibility study includes cancer patients who have been hospitalized for acute cancer complications and biological evidence of iron deficiency. Exclusion criteria apply to patients with hemoglobin levels below 7 g/dL, active bleeding or contraindications to iron carboxymaltose. Participants received a single IV infusion of FCM (1000 mg). Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and characterize anemia etiology; secondary objectives were hemoglobin response, transfusion requirements within 4 weeks, and exploratory predictive biomarkers.
resultsOf 55 enrolled patients, 51 received FCM. Response rates-defined as a hemoglobin increase ≥1 g/dL were 33% at week 2 and 39% at week 4. Transfusion rates reached 15% by day 28. No reliable predictive biomarkers were identified.
conclusionOur results suggest that a single dose of IV FCM is effective in increasing hemoglobin levels. No predictive biomarkers were identified, likely due to the modest sample size, advanced disease, and complex inpatient status. IV iron supplementation trials in this population are feasible; multicentric trials are needed to enroll larger samples. Furthermore, quality-of-life endpoints should be incorporated, which were difficult to capture here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40839228What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.