ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
Effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover type on soil organic carbon fractions in semi-arid rangelands of Kenya.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and molecular characterisation ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover types on mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya. Research was conducted at Mpala Research Centre (controlled grazing) and Ilmotiok Community Group Ranch (continuous grazing) in Laikipia County. A factorial experimental design with a split-plot arrangement was used in this study. Grazing management practices (controlled and continuous grazing) and topographic positions (midslope, foot slope, and bottomland) were assigned to the main plots, while land cover types (bare ground, grass patches, and tree mosaics) were designated as subplots. Soil samples were collected at 10 cm intervals, 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, and 20-30 cm depth for MAOC and POC analysis. Data analysis was done using R software, where nonparametric tests were done when the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were violated.
resultsControlled grazing resulted in higher MAOC (0.361%) and POC (0.683%) compared to continuous grazing (0.352% and 0.548%, respectively), indicating an increase of 2.56% in MAOC and 24.64% in POC under controlled grazing. This can largely be attributed to improved vegetation recovery, especially in midslope areas. The highest MAOC (0.367%) was found in the bottomland, likely due to reduced erosion and improved water retention. The midslope and foot slope positions had lower MAOC means of 0.358% and 0.344%, respectively. Depth analysis showed peak MAOC at 20 cm (0.390%), with controlled grazing resulting in better carbon retention at 30 cm. Similarly, controlled grazing yielded a mean POC of 0.683% versus 0.548% for continuous grazing, with bottomland having the highest POC of 0.754%. A Kruskal‒Wallis tests showed significant differences in MAOC and POC across land cover types (χ² = 42.701, p < 0.001 for MAOC, and χ² = 83.53, p < 0.001 for POC), with tree mosaics and bare land contributing most to POC and MAOC, respectively.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the beneficial role of controlled grazing and diverse land cover in enhancing soil carbon storage. To promote sustainable rangeland management, it is recommended that rangeland managers adopt controlled grazing practices and allow diverse land cover types, such as tree mosaics, to increase carbon sequestration and ecosystem resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.