Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839131›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2025

Comparison of statistical models for time-dependent repellency using the novel Pole-dance bioassay against Tetranychus urticae Koch.

Junho Yoon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Junho YoonResearch Institute of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. mothquitoman@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating the repellency of essential oils against Tetranychus urticae requires robust methodologies to detect time-dependent changes in their efficacy, due to differential efficacy, volatility, and sustained effectiveness. This study introduces the Pole-dance bioassay, a novel no-choice method optimized for high-throughput screening of time-dependent repellency, demonstrated through tests on twenty botanical volatiles against T. urticae. Four statistical models, probit, two-parameter Hill, four-parameter Hill, and Gaussian Process (GP) regression, were compared for analyzing time-response landing data, employing both experimental results and scenario-based synthetic datasets reflecting diverse curve shapes. GP regression often provided superior model fits, especially for biphasic or incomplete landing trajectories. While repellency rankings based on median effective time (ET

Indexed as

AcaricidesBiological AssayModels, StatisticalOils, VolatileTetranychidaeAnimalsAcaricidesOils, VolatileEssential oilsGaussian processHigh-throughputRepellentSpider mite

Identifiers

PMID40839131
PMCPMC12370553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.