Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40839048›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Protecting nature in diverse ways: The socio-demographic spread of benefits from connecting with nature.

Kate Sollis, Lily van Eeden, Usitha Rajeevan, Kate Lee, Brenda Lin, Lucy Keniger, Pauline Marsh, Emily Flies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate SollisGeography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay Campus, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia. Kate.Sollis@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-8805
Lily van EedenRMIT University STEM College, Applied Chemistry and Environmental Sciences Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-9670
Usitha RajeevanGeography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay Campus, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0925-1568
Kate LeeDepartment of Energy, Environment, and Climate Action, Government of Victoria, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8329-079X
Brenda LinCSIRO, Land & Water Ecosystem Sciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD, 4102, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6011-9172
Lucy KenigerGeography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay Campus, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
Pauline MarshWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay Campus, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-2628
Emily FliesGeography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay Campus, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1013-0330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nature connection and its relationships with stewardship vary across social and environmental contexts. Through a nationally representative survey in Australia, this study examined engagement in four different pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) (advocacy, consumer-conscious, conservation, and gardening), their socio-demographic correlates, and the associations with both nature connection and well-being. We found strong associations between nature connection and all examined PEBs; however, different groups were more likely to engage in different types of PEBs. For example, younger adults are more likely to engage in advocacy and conservation behaviours, while older Australians are more likely to engage in consumer-conscious behaviours and gardening. All PEBs were significantly associated with well-being; however, only the advocacy behaviours variable remained significant when including nature connection as a control variable. These findings highlight the importance of biodiversity policies that holistically enhance nature connection for a range of people, alongside sustainability measures to support the well-being of both people and planet.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesNatureAdultAgedAustraliaBiodiversityFemaleGardeningHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultEnvironmental stewardshipGardeningLife satisfactionNature connectionPro-environmental behaviours

Identifiers

PMID40839048
PMCPMC12779869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.