ReviewAnnals of hematology2025
Anti-plasma cell therapy in patients with monoclonal gammopathy-associated refractory pure red cell aplasia: A report of three cases and literature review.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Monoclonal Gammopathy as a Potential Cause of Pure Red Cell Aplasia: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acquired pure red cell aplasia (aPRCA) is a clinical syndrome that may be secondary to a diverse array of diseases. It is rarely secondary to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Currently, there is no consensus on when to initiate anti-plasma cell therapy. This study reports three cases of patients with MGUS-associated aPRCA who responded to anti-plasma cell therapy after failing conventional immunosuppressive treatment. Patient 1 achieved complete remission after treatment with the BD (bortezomib and dexamethasone) and BRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimens. She subsequently received lenalidomide as maintenance treatment. She has remained in treatment-free survival (TFS) for 22 months to date. Patient 2 achieved complete remission after treatment with the BRD regimen and was maintained with lenalidomide. She has maintained TFS for 16 months so far. Patient 3 was treated with the BD regimen and became transfusion-independent, but relapsed after treatment discontinuation due to COVID-19 infection.This study suggests that anti-plasma cell therapy may be an effective strategy for aPRCA patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy and exhibiting monoclonal protein (M-protein). However, further studies are needed to explore the optimal timing and duration of such therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.