ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2026
Quantitation of alcohols and acetone in postmortem blood and urine using headspace gas chromatography mass spectrometry.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GC-FID quantification of methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, acetone, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, 1,2-propylene glycol and 1,3-propylene glycol in plasma.Journal of analytical toxicology · 2026Article
- Dual-Column HS-GC-FID/FID Method for In-Depth Analysis of Low-Molecular-Weight Volatile Alcohols inJournal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, ethanol and related compounds have been analyzed by headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. However, this does not provide structural information, relying solely on retention time for identification. With a mass spectrometry (MS) detector, isotope labeled internal standards can be used, eliminating the risk associated with using internal standards like 1-propanol, that can be present in postmortem samples. Furthermore, the use of ion ratios for confirmation of identity eliminates the need for dual injections on columns with different selectivity. In addition, the MS detector provides the ability to include a full scan, which could be helpful in the identification of other volatile unknowns. This prompted the implementation of a headspace gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric method quantifying methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol, and acetone while enabling the qualitative detection of a number of other volatiles. A 100 µL sample aliquot was dispensed into a 20 mL headspace vial together with 1000 µL of internal standard solution. Samples were analyzed using an Agilent 7697A headspace sampler coupled to an Agilent Intuvo 9000 gas chromatograph and an Agilent 5977 MS. The developed method was successfully validated and compared to current methodology before being implemented into routine analysis. The introduction of quantitative determination of putrefactive alcohols enables prospective studies of the possible relationship between the formation of ethanol and 1-propanol and 1-butanol and increased the diagnostic power of the method. The simultaneous detection of other volatiles important in postmortem toxicology in all cases increased the scope of routine analysis and the use of MS improved the identification of analytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.