Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Christoph WalcherDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-7506-7603
Piet SpaakDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-373X
Marie Serwaty-SárazováInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Silvana KäserDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.
Thea BulasDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.
Christine Dambone-BöschDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.
Eric DexterDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2296-9923
Jürgen HottingerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel 4051, Switzerland.
Laura BöttnerInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-686X
Christoph VorburgerDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3627-0841
Dieter EbertDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-3772
Shuqing XuInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7010-4604
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 435681637European Commission (EC) 101125029Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) 310030_188887Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) 310030_219529
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Indirect ecological effects occur when the impact of one species on another is mediated by a third species or the shared environment. Although indirect effects are ubiquitous in nature, we know remarkably little about how they may drive ecoevolutionary processes across community boundaries. Here, we show that insect (aphid) herbivory on macrophytes (duckweed) drove the adaptive evolution of a planktonic crustacean (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Aphid herbivory on macrophytes drives adaptive evolution in an aquatic community via indirect effects. · full record | OpenQuestion