ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Guidance for the design and analysis of cell-type-specific DNA methylation epidemiology studies.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimised fluorescence-activated nuclei sorting for epigenomic analysis of cortical cell types.PloS one · 2026Article
- Cell-type-specific DNA methylation dynamics in the prenatal and postnatal human cortex.Cell genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies on the role of epigenetics in disease have focused on DNA methylation (DNAm) profiled in bulk tissues limiting the detection of the cell type affected by disease-related changes. Advances in isolating homogeneous populations of cells now make it possible to identify DNAm differences associated with disease in specific cell types. Critically, these datasets will require a bespoke analytical framework that can characterize whether the difference affects multiple or is specific to a particular cell type. We take advantage of a large set of DNAm profiles (n = 751) obtained from five different purified cell populations isolated from human prefrontal cortex samples and evaluate the effects on study design, data preprocessing, and statistical analysis for cell-specific studies, particularly for scenarios where multiple cell types are included. We describe novel quality control metrics that confirm successful isolation of purified cell populations, which when included in standard preprocessing pipelines provide confidence in the dataset. Our power calculations show substantial gains in detecting differentially methylated positions for some purified cell populations compared to bulk tissue analyses, countering concerns regarding the feasibility of generating large enough sample sizes for informative epidemiological studies. In a simulation study, we evaluated different regression models finding that this choice impacts on the robustness of the results. These findings informed our proposed two-stage framework for association analyses. Overall, our results provide guidance for cell-specific epigenome-wide association studies, establishing standards for study design and analysis, while showcasing the potential of cell-specific DNAm analyses to reveal links between epigenetic dysregulation and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.