Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838573›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2026

Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa: A Concept Analysis.

Sarah Ramsay, Kendra Allison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah RamsayHealthcare Genetics Program, School of Nursing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-0129
Kendra AllisonHealthcare Genetics Program, School of Nursing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDespite decades of research, we still know surprisingly little about how best to bring about lasting recovery from anorexia nervosa (AN). Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus in the research and treatment communities about what constitutes recovery from AN, or whether "recovery" is even an appropriate term to use in this context. The aim of this study was to analyse the concept of AN recovery from the perspectives of various stakeholders.

designConcept analysis.

methodWalker and Avant's eight-stage concept analysis method.

resultsThere continues to be a lack of consensus around the defining criteria for AN recovery. However, there are certain clinical, psychological and quality-of-life attributes that are recurrent in those defined as being in recovery.

conclusionsThough BMI and rate of weight gain are the primary criteria used to define recovery from AN, in recent years it has become clear that the definition of healthy weight varies and that weight alone is insufficient to fully define recovery. With recent advancements in biomarker and genetics research, there is hope that more objective measures of recovery will be defined. Quality of life as defined by both patients and caregivers is also critical to recovery; however, it is often not adequately assessed in studies of AN. Though the path to recovery is highly individualised, and there are risks in implementing strict criteria for recovery, in research, consensus is needed for adequate comparison of studies evaluating different treatment modalities. Additionally, such criteria are needed to help clinicians with decision-making authority, including advanced practice nurses, provide the most effective treatment options to their patients. Future research should focus on better defining recovery from AN and on facilitating nurse-led system-level advocacy to educate and equip advanced practice nurses in helping those with AN move toward recovery. IMPLICATIONS: This concept analysis provides an overview of recovery from AN from the perspectives of a wide array of stakeholders and the last 20 years of published data. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaAdultHumansQuality of Lifeanorexia nervosaconcept analysisrecoveryremissionsevere enduring anorexia nervosa

Identifiers

PMID40838573
PMCPMC13069270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.