Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838570›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Complex Rule Transfer Recruits Rostral Prefrontal and Ventromedial Prefrontal Neural Networks.

Carol A Seger, Weiye Xie, Peijuan Li, Linzhu Han, Zhiya Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carol A SegerCenter for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Weiye XieCenter for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Peijuan LiCenter for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Linzhu HanCenter for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhiya LiuCenter for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5686-9678

Funding

Research Center for Brian Cognition and Human Development, Guangdong, China 2024B0303390003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How are rules used to transfer knowledge to new stimuli? We used a complex rule learning and transfer task to identify neural systems underlying rule learning, application, and transfer to novel stimuli. We used functional MRI Constrained Principal Components Analysis (fMRI-CPCA) to identify neural systems active during each phase. Two networks were associated with rule transfer. First, a rostral prefrontal network that was recruited during rule transfer with higher activity for more complex rules. This network is consistent with previous research finding that the rostral prefrontal cortex is necessary for abstract and hierarchical rule learning, relational integration, and analogical mapping in human reasoning. Second, a ventromedial prefrontal-hippocampal network that began to be recruited during rule application and increased in activity across the rule transfer phase with greater activity for more difficult rules. This pattern indicates a role in applying rules regardless of stimulus familiarity, as well as sensitivity to the difficulty of the transfer. These results are consistent with previous research establishing the role of the VMPFC-hippocampal network in forming and applying memory schemas via processes of schema reinstatement. Frontoparietal systems associated with the dorsal attention and salience networks were recruited primarily during rule learning and decreased in activity in the later stages of the task. Overall, the results indicate that rule learning and rule transfer differ qualitatively and that additional memory and executive function networks are utilized during transfer to support the cognitive demands necessary to generalize knowledge to new stimuli and integrate sources of information to make a decision.

Indexed as

HippocampusNerve NetPrefrontal CortexTransfer, PsychologyAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultgeneralizationhypothesis testingrelational reasoningrule learningschema reinstatementtransfer

Identifiers

PMID40838570
PMCPMC12368797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.