ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Effect of Ranibizumab in Patients with Treatment-Naïve Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in patients with treatment-naïve retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in terms of disease regression and need for rescue therapy. Materials and Methods: This study evaluated disease regression and rescue therapy requirement in treatment-naïve ROP cases treated with IVR. Among 188 screened patients, 80 had ROP. Thirty-eight patients (76 eyes) with type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP (AROP) were included. Treatment involved a single dose of 0.2 mg ranibizumab injected under aseptic conditions. Patients were monitored post-treatment for up to 6 months. Recurrence of disease was managed with argon laser photocoagulation targeting the peripheral avascular retina. Data analysis utilized t-tests for continuous variables and χ² tests for categorical data, with a significance threshold of p<0.05. Results: The study included 19 males and 19 females, with 56 eyes having AROP and 20 eyes with type 1 ROP. All AROP cases required rescue therapy, with a mean interval of 3.43±0.84 weeks between treatments. Sixty percent of type 1 ROP eyes also needed laser therapy. While type 1 ROP cases had slightly higher gestational age and lower birth weight compared to AROP, these differences were not statistically significant (p=0.081 and p=0.27, respectively). However, the interval between treatments was significantly longer in type 1 ROP than in AROP (p=0.0016). Conclusion: Ranibizumab demonstrated effectiveness in initial disease regression but was linked to reactivation in all AROP and 60% of type 1 ROP cases, highlighting the importance of more frequent follow-ups after ranibizumab injection, particularly for AROP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.