Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838464›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2025

Incorporating data from multiple ongoing trials for Bayesian two-stage phase II single-arm studies.

Susan Halabi, Taehwa Choi, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Richard L Schilsky, Lorenzo Trippa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan HalabiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-2777
Taehwa ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Elizabeth Garrett-MayerAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-0333
Richard L SchilskyAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Lorenzo TrippaDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Clinical genomic predictive model of first line androgen receptor inhibitor therapy outcomes in men with mCRPCR01CA256157 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, ANDREW J, DEHM, SCOTT M. · 2020 to 2025
$3.2M
Interactions of Androgen Production, Uptake and Metabolism on outcome in Castration Resistant Prostate CancerR01CA249279 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HALABI, SUSAN, SHARIFI, NIMA · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Statistical Methods and Validation Analyses for the Integration of External Data in Clinical TrialsR01LM013352 · NLM · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI TRIPPA, LORENZO · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Sieve based full likelihood approach for the Cox proportional hazards model with applications to immunotherapies trialsR21CA263950 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HALABI, SUSAN, WU, YUAN · 2023 to 2024
$405k
FDA HHS U01 FD007857NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249279NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256157NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263950NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimBasket designs have been utilized in recent oncology clinical trials due to an increased interest in precision medicine. One current successful basket trial is the American Society for Clinical Oncology Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study, a pragmatic phase II trial where patients are matched based on their tumor genomic profile to treatments that target specific genomic alterations. Despite its success, recruiting patients with rare genomic alterations remains challenging. This study aims to introduce and evaluate a Bayesian approach for integrating data from ongoing independent basket trials that share similar primary aims to improve interim decisions and final analyses and reduce necessary to evaluate treatments.

methodsWe introduce a Bayesian two-stage phase II single-arm trial specifically for rare cancers utilizing a hierarchical Bayesian random effects model that incorporate data from ongoing trials. We compare this approach with the standard Simon two-stage design through extensive numerical simulations and apply it to real-world scenarios.

resultsSimulation results demonstrate that in rare populations our Bayesian approach has attractive operating characteristics. The simulations show that our approach performs well across a broad set of scenarios with fixed and variable numbers of trials.

conclusionOur proposed Bayesian two-stage approach effectively integrates data from multiple ongoing basket trials, enhancing the ability to recruit and analyze patients with rare genomic alterations. This approach improves the timing of interim decision-making and final analysis, making it a valuable tool for trials with slow accrual rates.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicNeoplasmsResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansPrecision MedicineBasket trialsclinical trialshierarchical Bayesian modelrandom effectSimon-two stage design

Identifiers

PMID40838464
PMCPMC12373003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.