ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Machine learning models for predicting the risk of depressive symptoms in Chinese college students.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Student Depression Risk.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association Between New Tea Drink Consumption and Mental Health Disorders Among Chinese College Students: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation and predictive efficacy of a comprehensive depression risk model for undergraduates.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in college students' mental health education: opportunities, challenges, and strategic responses.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Lifestyle, psychological and demographic predictors of anxiety: insights from a large-scale survey and machine learning analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Depression is highly prevalent among college students, and accurately identifying risk factors is essential for timely intervention. Given the limitations of traditional linear models in managing high-dimensional data, this study employed machine learning techniques to predict depressive symptoms. Method: Data were collected from 1,635 Chinese college students and included 38 sociodemographic, psychological, and social variables. Four machine- learning algorithms, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Support Vector Machine, were evaluated. Results: Results showed that the Random Forest model achieved the highest discriminant performance with an AUC of 0.87 and an accuracy of 0.79, and identified key predictors such as sleep disturbance, perceived stress, experiential avoidance, and self-criticism. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis further revealed that deteriorating sleep quality and heightened stress levels significantly increased the risk of depressive symptoms. Discussion: These findings validate the effectiveness of Random Forest in capturing complex data interactions and offer actionable insights for targeted mental health interventions. Future studies should improve generalizability by incorporating more diverse samples and physiological biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.