Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838220›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2025

Evaluation of reduction quality and implant positioning in intertrochanteric fracture fixation: A review of key radiographic parameters.

Matthias Wittauer, Joseph Henry, Guillermo Sánchez-Rosenberg, Anton Philip Lambers, Christopher W Jones, Piers J Yates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Positive cortical support reduction in treatment of trochanteric femur fractures: history in theory establishment and its inspiration for clinical innovations].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias WittauerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, Perth 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Joseph HenryDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, Perth 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Guillermo Sánchez-RosenbergFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel 4001, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.
Anton Philip LambersDivision of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
Christopher W JonesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, Perth 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Piers J YatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, Perth 6150, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intertrochanteric fractures, prevalent among older adults, pose significant clinical challenges due to high morbidity, mortality, and complication rates. Despite advancements in surgical methods and implant technology, one-year mortality remains between 20% and 30%, with up to 20% of survivors requiring revision surgery due to mechanical complications. Accurate fracture reduction and precise implant positioning are critical determinants of successful outcomes. This review synthesizes current literature on key radiographic parameters essential for evaluating fracture reduction quality and implant placement in intertrochanteric fracture fixation. Standardized intraoperative imaging techniques, such as correct anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views, are fundamental for identifying malalignment. Important radiographic measures include the neck shaft angle, greater trochanter orthogonal line, anterior cortical line, and calcar displacement assessment. Reduction quality indices, notably the Baumgaertner and Chang Reduction Quality Criteria, provide reliable frameworks for predicting mechanical complications. Additionally, implant positioning parameters-including tip-apex distance, Calcar-referenced tip-apex distance, Cleveland zones, and Parker's ratio index-are discussed as predictors of mechanical complications. Enhanced understanding and application of these radiographic criteria can improve surgical precision, reduce complications, and ultimately optimize patient outcomes in intertrochanteric fracture management.

Indexed as

Cephalomedullary nailComplicationsHipImplant positioningIntertrochanteric fracturesRadiographic assessmentReduction quality

Identifiers

PMID40838220
PMCPMC12362672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.